Sprinter in the starting blocks
Who we serve · 1 / 4

Built for athletes.

See where you rank — one test gives a rating against real norms.

For athletes

See where you rank.

One test result gives a rating against real norms for your sport, gender and level — and an early read on the sport your profile is built for.

303 tests · 625 norm sets · 6-band ratingsSee where I rank
Sprinter driving out of the starting blocks
Hurley and sliotar on the pitch
For coaches

Benchmark every athlete you coach.

Generate a testing sheet, run the session, import the results — every athlete's numbers in before training ends, rated against named norms on the Advanced and Pro plans. Sprint, throws, forwards, backs: your training groups are free and unlimited on every plan, whether you coach a field-sport squad or twelve individuals.

25 athletes · 1 team · training groups unlimitedStart as a coach
For clubs and teams

Every squad, one picture.

Readiness, form and injury flags across every team in your club — football, hurling and camogie sides side by side, with training groups inside each team, unlimited on every plan.

125 athletes · 5 teams · groups unlimitedSet up my club
Team huddle before a match
How it works

From a number to a decision.

Very good

29.0 cm, measured 2026-06-15 — a published reference: girls and women in Ladies Gaelic Football, ages 17-40

29.0 cm of jump height is one number. Rated against a published reference for this athlete's gender and age it reads very good. The 3 inputs beneath it each carry a band and a date: 1 against a published reference, and 2 illustrative, marked as such, where no published reference exists yet for this sport. That is the difference between a score and a decision. Work the lowest-rated input first: time from the 505 Agility Test (an illustrative rating).

Factors 5 inputs, 1 not rated
InputValueBandMeasured
Jump Height (Counter-Movement Jump) (Example)Example figure29.0 cmVery good

Compared with a published reference: girls and women in Ladies Gaelic Football, ages 17-40; n = 92 (Hughes et al. 2024).

measured 2026-06-15
Change since 2026-04-13 (Example)27.1 → 29.0 cmExample figure+1.9 cmNot ratedA change is arithmetic over two measurements, not a value a norm set rates — the direction of travel is the right one.measured 2026-06-15
Time (20m Sprint) (Example)Example figure3.45 sAverage

Compared with a published reference: girls and women in Ladies Gaelic Football, ages 16-45; n = 106 (McGuinness et al. 2026).

measured 2026-06-15
Accumulated Distance (Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test L1) (Example)Example figure984 mExcellentIllustrative ratingmeasured 2026-06-15
Time (505 Agility Test) (Example)Example figure2.57 sPoorIllustrative ratingmeasured 2026-06-15

Every figure above is illustrative: an example athlete, not a real person, and no real athlete's data is ever shown on this page. Ratings marked “Illustrative rating” are examples too; the rest are rated against the published reference named on the row.

Solid marks a measured value; dotted marks one the platform calculates from other values. Every value on this card is an example.

Enter a test

A jump height, a sprint time, a grip score — one number you already know is enough to start.

under 90 seconds

See your rating

Rated on a six-band scale against real published norms for your sport, gender and level.

625 norm sets

Discover your sport

Cross-sport suitability shows where your physical profile ranks highest — and what to test next.

24 sports compared
The platform

The science, after you sign up.

Testing hubs, season planning and squad boards live inside the platform — built on your data, opened by your account.

The population

Jump Height across Ladies' Gaelic football

Measured with the Counter-Movement Jump

Cohort Compared with a published reference: girls and women in Ladies Gaelic Football, ages 17-40; n = 92 (Hughes et al. 2024).

  • Ladies' Gaelic football
  • Women and girls
  • Ages 17-40
Example25.1–28.3 cmGood

Example only, not a real athlete: a jump height of 25.1–28.3 cm is Good, in the top 50% of this cohort.

  • Everyone in this cohort
  • An example athlete’s result (illustrative)
  • Rating bands, on the same scale as the bars
The numbers behind the bars
  • 16.8-18.4 cm5% of the cohort
  • 18.4-21.6 cm15% of the cohort
  • 21.6-25.1 cm25% of the cohort
  • 25.1-28.3 cm25% of the cohort
  • 28.3-30.6 cm15% of the cohort
  • 30.6-32.9 cm5% of the cohort

The bars cover the middle 90 per cent of this cohort in cm. The published table gives no value edge for the 5 per cent below or the 5 per cent above, so neither end is drawn. We do not invent a band edge to finish a picture.

  1. 30.6 cm or more· Excellent10%
  2. 28.3–30.6 cm· Very good15%
  3. 25.1–28.3 cm· GoodExample25%
  4. 21.6–25.1 cm· Average25%
  5. 18.4–21.6 cm· Fair15%
  6. Under 18.4 cm· Poor10%

The first and last rows are open-ended: the published table gives no lowest or highest value, and we do not invent one.

Your own result is drawn in your own cohort, on your own report. That is what an account buys.

Each cohort is one published study, drawn on its own. We never combine two studies into one chart. Values from two studies are not comparable with each other -- the protocol differs as much as the population does.

Track progress

Banded trend charts with meaningful-change markers on every measure you record.

Plan the season

A periodised calendar built from your fixtures, with recommended test windows.

Own your data

You choose what is shared. Your results join a shared comparison only if you grant it, on your own profile, and you can take it back in one click.

Start optimising now